You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2024

Litigation Details for In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y. 2020)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
The small molecule drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷  Sign Up .

Details for In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
0000-00-00 External link to document
2021-03-22 255 Amended Complaint Bystolic: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,545,040 (the “’040 Patent”) and 5,759,580 (the “’580 Patent”). Beginning on…succeeded in the patent litigation because the ’040 Patent was weak. The ’040 Patent litigation likely…name.” The ’362 Patent was prior art to the ’040 Patent. In light of the ’362 Patent’s essentially explicit…them of infringing the ’040 Patent. Forest did not assert the ’580 Patent against the Generic Defendants…Generic Defendants’ patent settlement agreements with Forest in the Bystolic patent litigation. External link to document
2021-03-22 256 Amended Complaint application for Bystolic: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,545,040 (the “’040 Patent”) and 5,759,580 (the …succeeded in the patent litigation because the ’040 Patent is weak. The ’040 Patent litigation likely… Patents Are Not Bulletproof. 120. Patents are not bulletproof. Patents are routinely… issued United States Patent No. 4,654,362 (“the ’362 Patent”). The ’362 Patent disclosed a number of…153 The ’362 Patent was prior art to the ’040 Patent. In light of the ’362 Patent’s essentially explicit External link to document
2022-02-02 354 ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings AND Memorandum & Opinion two patents for inclusion in the FDA’s Orange Book: U.S. Patent No. 6,545,040 (“the ’040 Patent”) and…and U.S. Patent No. 5,759,580 (“the ’580 Patent”). Id. ¶¶ 4, 124. The ’040 Patent issued on April 8, …the ’580 Patents, Forest only asserted the ’040 Patent and declined to sue on the ’580 Patent. DPP Compl… Torrent’s patents prior to the patent assignment agreement, and only executed the patent assignment …manufacturer for patent infringement. DPP Compl. ¶ 101. If the brand manufacturer sues for patent infringement External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.